Skip to main content
Mutual Fund Intelligence

Your Funds,Finally Explained

Ask in plain English. Get goal probability, Direct vs Regular comparisons, portfolio risk, and tax impact — grounded in 14,000+ Indian mutual fund schemes, with charts and tables every time — and a PDF report on the deeper analyses.

14,000+ schemes · Not investment advice · Free to start

Will I reach ₹1 crore by 55 with a ₹25,000 SIP?
Monte Carlo · thousands of paths
Probability of success72%

Raising the SIP to ₹30,000 lifts the odds to 81%. The shortfall risk sits mostly in the first market cycle.

PDF reportCharts · tables · kept in this chat
Computed on 14,000+ schemes — illustrative output
+Schemes Tracked
Analysis Engines
Ready-Made Analyses
Commissions — Analysis, Not Distribution

Ask. It computes. You keep the proof.

01

Ask in your own words

Type the question as you would say it — or pick one of 15 ready-made analyses and fill in a short form, right in the chat.

02

Real math runs on real data

Monte Carlo goal odds, expense-gap compounding, manager-alpha regression — computed on the 14,000-scheme dataset, not summarised from articles.

03

Keep what you can check

Every answer returns charts and tables, collected in the chat’s artifacts panel — and heavier analyses export a PDF report you can save or share.

Will You Actually Hit Your Number?

Ask about a goal — a retirement corpus, a down payment, a child’s education fund — in plain English. A Monte Carlo simulation returns a probability of success, how it shifts as your monthly SIP changes, and how your equity allocation should glide as retirement nears.

Monte Carlo Simulation

Thousands of simulated paths across your SIP, lump sum, and horizon

Probability of Success

One honest percentage — not a comforting average-case chart

SIP Sensitivity

See exactly how the odds shift as your monthly contribution changes

Retirement Glide Paths

Equity-to-debt allocation that shifts automatically as the goal nears

Probability of success
SIP sensitivity

The Expense Gap, in Real Rupees

See what a Regular plan’s higher expense ratio actually costs: the analysis measures the observed return gap between the Direct and Regular versions of the same scheme, then projects that drag compounded over your holding period — in rupees, not basis points.

Expense Drag, Quantified

The observed Direct-vs-Regular gap, projected and compounded over your horizon

Scheme-to-Scheme Comparisons

Any schemes side by side, across 14,000+ tracked funds

Peer Ranking

Percentile rank against the scheme’s own category peers, over 3- or 5-year windows

Tax-Aware Restructuring

A dedicated analysis models LTCG, exit loads and lock-ins in rupees before you switch

Is Your Fund Manager Skill — or Luck?

The alpha analysis regresses your fund against its benchmark and answers the question fees depend on: is the outperformance real? You get Jensen’s alpha with a statistical significance test — and when the math can’t tell skill from luck, it says exactly that.

Alpha vs Benchmark

Fund and benchmark returns over your window, with Jensen’s alpha annualised

Skill-or-Luck Test

A t-test on alpha — “significant” or “skill vs luck unclear”, never false confidence

Tracking Error & IR

How far the fund strays from its benchmark, and whether straying paid

Peer Percentile

Where the fund ranks against its own category’s peers

Your Funds, Backed by Evidence.

Goal odds, true cost, and portfolio risk — every answer drawn from the same 14,000-scheme dataset, shown in charts and numbers you can check yourself.

14,000+ schemes tracked · Free to start

Analytical output for reference only, not investment advice. Consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making decisions.